Networked Knowledge - Books Online

Losing Their Grip - the case of Henry Keogh - Dr Robert N Moles
Chapter Two - Friday 18 March 1994

Losing Their Grip - table of contents

Also by Dr Moles - A state of Injustice - Definition and Rule in Legal Theory

Anna-Jane Cheney died on the evening of Friday 18 March 1994. We set out here the events leading up to and immediately following her death. The material has been taken from the statements compiled by the police during their investigations into her death. It tells what happened at the time in the way in which the people involved with the situation described it.

During the course of their investigations, police gather information from various people. That which seems to be most relevant to their inquiries will then be presented to senior officers or prosecutors in the form of a formal statement. It is usual for each statement to be signed and dated on each page by the person making it, and by the officer taking it. In South Australia, a statement normally begins with a declaration in the following form:

“This statement consisting of     pages signed by me is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

I understand that if this statement is filed in court for the purposes of a prosecution pursuant to section 104 of the Summary Procedure Act and it is to my knowledge false or misleading in a material particular I am guilty of an offence pursuant to the provisions of the Summary Procedure Act.
Dated                                      Signed”

The declaration is to remind those making statements that they are made in contemplation of criminal proceedings. Usually, the information they contain will focus on issues that might relate to the guilt or innocence of any possible suspect.

The information they contain is usually elicited in the form of questions and answers. However, the statements are written up by the police as a continuous narrative, without the questions. Obviously, it takes some time to convert the notes of questions and answers into written statements.

It is important before signing any statement to ensure that no errors, slips or omissions have come about in the preparation of the typed statement from the notes. When it is said that someone had failed to mention something in a statement, the answer might be that they were not asked about it, or that it may have been missed out in transcribing it from the notes. With an expert witness, who has a special responsibility to disclose all relevant issues, special care should be taken to ensure this does not happen.

We have presented the statements from the various standpoints of the family members, ambulance officers and police. The names of two female witnesses with whom Keogh was said to have been involved, were suppressed at the time of the trial and remain suppressed. Nevertheless, the media were at liberty to report the substance of what they had to say, as we do here.

On the night that Anna died, there were about 20 people who attended at the scene after her death. With each of them giving statements about what they were doing at various times that night, it is no easy task to assess them against each other for consistency and accuracy.

What we know from the statements

Sue Keogh said that she had been married to Henry, but he had left her (and their three children) in June 1991. In January 1992 he had phoned her to say that he was sorry the way things had turned out. The divorce papers had gone to the Family Court. He apparently said that he didn’t want to be divorced and Sue said that she didn’t want that either. She made one last appeal to him to stop the papers going through; but they were to be served on her just days later. She had thought that there was to be a discontinuance of the divorce proceedings. She was very dismayed when she subsequently received the decree nisi which was set to become absolute on 1 May 1992.

It seems that Henry had been having an affair with Anna Cheney during the last 18 months of his relationship with Sue. Then, in March 1992 Henry began meeting up with Ms A, a person he met through his work at the Bank. Ms A said that he had told her that he was breaking up with his girlfriend Anna and that he didn’t want to get married -- ever. He didn’t want more children, which would have been difficult anyway, because he had had a vasectomy. It seems that Henry told Ms A that he had been to medical school and that he had a detailed knowledge of the human body. She said that he seemed to be really interested in martial arts and had bragged to her that he could kill someone with a single blow.

On one occasion, she said Henry had telephoned her during the day and said he wanted to meet after work, which they did. They went to the Oxford Hotel in North Adelaide and he talked about his breaking up with Anna, ‘weaning her off him’ was how she said he had put it. Apparently he started crying and telling Ms A that he knew it was for Anna’s benefit. Ms A said that he continued crying and sobbing and that she felt embarrassed. She knew that he had been living with Anna for a couple of years.

In May 1992, Sue received the final divorce papers. She was pretty upset. She contacted Henry on his pager and he came over. He told her he didn’t know what had happened. Sue said he seemed upset and there were tears in his eyes. He told her he had checked up, but the divorce process could not be halted. To be truthful, she said, he didn’t know who he wanted to be with. Whilst she had never asked him outright if he would return to her, she wanted him to. 

On Sunday 7 June 1992, Ms A was at a shopping centre in Adelaide when she saw Henry with a woman. Henry had told her three months previously that he had broken-up with Anna, so she was surprised when he introduced her as Anna. Henry phoned Ms A the following day to say that he and Anna were just friends. He had been helping her to buy a lounge-suite. 

Ms A thought nothing more about it. She had left her previous boyfriend and things between her and Henry were becoming more intimate. She said in her statement that ‘this’ started on 15 July 1992. Apparently, whilst Henry would go around to Ms A’s place, she thought it odd that he would never stay there later than 2am. It seems that he always made excuses not to stay all night. He reassured Ms A that he was not seeing Anna.

Of Wednesday 30 September 1992 Ms A said, ‘today was another teary display’. The previous Sunday, Henry was to have joined her and her friends sailing. She kept paging him during the weekend, but there was no reply. Then, on the Wednesday, he came to her house, knelt on the floor in front of the fire and said how sorry he was. It seems he had been too ill to contact her. She said he was distressed, having tears in his eyes. He seemed very sorry for himself. 

Sue said that in October 1992 her children mentioned that Henry was seeing Anna again. She confronted Henry about it and he told her he was living with Anna. Until then, Sue believed he would get tired of his new lifestyle and return home. He had a key to the family home and visited the children regularly. Sue said that despite the way she felt, they were still friends and got on well. At times he would kiss her on the cheek when he left. She wrote to tell him she loved him and that she would always ‘be there’ if he wanted to return home. She made it clear that she didn’t ask anything of him though.

Ms A finally broke up with Henry on 17 December 1992. She complained that he was never available for social things; he was always doing things with his kids; he was always complaining about his back. She said she had often asked Henry where he lived, but he would just reply, ‘somewhere in Kensington’. He said it was not very comfortable; that she wouldn’t like it there; he felt embarrassed about it. 

Ms A continued to meet Henry every two or three months throughout 1993. He continued to give her the impression he was not really seeing anyone. He said he had not been intimate with anyone since they broke-up. She said Henry was incredibly intelligent and structured in his thinking. She thought him to be manipulative and calculating beyond belief. She thought that when they had been involved, she had been manipulated to believe he was single. He said he was ‘asset-rich but cash-poor’. He complained about not having money, so that they took turns to pay for things when they went out. She thought it odd that whilst he was quite friendly, he never took her to visit his friends. She said that on 14 February 1994 she had lunch with Henry at the Seven Stars Hotel and he told her he was not seeing anyone.

It was around 4 March 1994, that Anna told a friend of hers of an argument she had with Henry. It seems Anna wanted Henry to buy a black suit for the wedding; he said he wanted to wear the grey suit that he already had.

Anna’s father, Dr Kevin Cheney, said he went to Anna’s house the evening of Monday 14 March, to wish her a happy birthday. He gave her $500 and a card. Anna showed him the card she received from Henry; it said he loved her very much and she made an enormous difference to his life. Anna was clearly thrilled with what Henry had written. The following day, Dr Cheney spoke with Anna on the phone and wished her a happy birthday.

Anna’s mother, Joanne, said that she remembered Wednesday 16 March very well. It was the day for the final fitting of the wedding dress.

Thursday was cleaning day at Anna’s house. Rodney was the regular cleaner. He remembered going there on Thursday 17 March. He was helped by his friend Darren. They vacuumed the carpets, cleaned the toilets and emptied the bins. He said that in the three months they had cleaned there, the bath had never been used. That day there was a vase of red roses in the bathroom and there were other flowers in the bedroom and throughout the house because of the birthday the day before. They had arrived around 1 pm and let themselves in with the key they had. Darren did the back of the house. They left when they finished about an hour and a half later.

Friday 18 March 1994, was a particularly trying day for Anna. As the Law Society’s Acting Manager for Professional Conduct, she had been investigating a solicitor. She had previously, in conjunction with the police, seized some of the files. However, after a number of rather heated telephone calls with him and the police earlier in the day, Anna had apparently accepted that the seizure of the files had been inappropriate. She then had to suffer the embarrassment of having to return the files to him that very day. He subsequently wrote to the Law Society to ask if suicide had been properly investigated.

Nothing of this appears in any of the statements from those who worked with Anna at the Law Society. It was not mentioned in the statements of her family or friends either. We do know, however, that Anna met with a number of them during the course of the day for coffee, and for lunch.

Susan Cheney was married to Anna’s brother Marc. Susan telephoned Anna at the Law Society that day and asked if their friend Lucinda been in touch with her. Susan wanted to know if Anna’s name was on a list for a night out. Anna said she didn’t know anything about it. Susan thought she might have ‘put her foot in it’. Susan asked Anna if she wanted to take their dogs for a walk that evening. Anna said she’d like that, but would have to do it after she’d been to the pub with Henry. She was going to meet him there after work.

One of the bar staff at the Norwood Hotel said that around 6.30 pm she served a man (who it appears was Henry) who was at the bar and ordering the Wynn’s Chardonnay which they had on ‘special’. He was drinking with a woman. They ordered some potato-wedges. He was well-dressed. He was given the wrong wine; the house wine, instead of the Wynn’s. He wasn’t upset or angry, she said, ‘he just seemed grateful we’d replaced the drinks’. She could not recognise them from the photo that was shown to her some days later. 

The other woman serving said she also remembered the couple. She did not take too much notice of the man. Whilst she too could not recognise them from the photo, she could remember them from their drinks, ‘it had something to do about giving them the wrong drinks’. She told the other person serving to tip out the house wine and replace it with the Wynn’s. When she cleared the table, she noticed that one glass was half-full. She hadn’t seen them arguing. She said the man wasn’t angry or rude to the bar staff, ‘he just stated that it was not the same wine as before’. 

Susan Cheney left work at 5.15 pm and was home around 5.30 pm. Anna phoned her at 7 pm and asked if she was ready to take the dogs for a walk. Susan told her that if she came over straightaway it would be better. Anna arrived about 7.30 pm, when Are You Being Served? was on the television. They drove to the nearby Newland Reserve.

Anna talked about the traffic on the road and meeting Henry at the pub. She said she wasn’t going out to dinner as she didn’t feel like anything else to eat. Anna certainly didn’t appear to be any the worse for drink.

They let the dogs out and Anna’s dog came running over and jumped up, butting his nose into Susan’s head. It brought tears to her eyes. Anna said he quite often did that. He often jumped higher than expected and he had once put her tooth through her lip. After half-an-hour at the park they arranged to meet up the next Sunday. Susan never spoke with Anna again after that.

Marc said he was at home when Anna had arrived at the house that evening. He said Susan had gone to the park with Anna to walk the dogs, whilst he had a shower. Susan was back around 8 pm. He went out for pizza and was home again at 8.30 pm.

Anna’s neighbour was at home that evening. She had two dogs. Around 7 pm one of them barked and kept running towards the front door. That was unusual. At that time she was at the back of the house doing the washing. She thought she wouldn’t have heard anything from outside over the noise of the washing-machine. She didn’t go to the front of the house to look around. Apart from that, she didn’t notice anything unusual. Her bathroom window faced Anna’s bathroom window, but she didn’t hear any noises or shouts that evening. Around 10 pm she noticed that the light was on in Anna’s bathroom. She never heard any arguments from Anna’s house. She said that if anyone had come over the back fence the dogs would have barked.

The neighbour on the other side arrived home with her husband around 7.15 pm that night. Around 8 pm she showered. Her husband had gone out to buy some takeaway food. She remembered hearing a car pull up outside and then hearing it sound the horn three times. That was unusual. Her husband returned home and they watched a movie on television. She couldn’t remember anyone next door ever sounding the horn when they arrived home, or at any time. Nobody ever found out who it was.  

Eileen was Henry’s mother. She had been divorced some years ago. Now in her mid 70s she lived a short drive from Henry and Anna’s house. Henry called over to see her that evening around 8.30 pm, just before Whistle-Blowers came on the television. It was much like any other visit. She liked telling Irish jokes. Henry kept looking at his watch. He was only going to stay for 20 minutes, but ended up staying for an hour. Henry didn’t like to talk to her about the wedding. She said she had accepted that they didn’t want her to be there in case there were any difficulties with Henry’s dad. There really wasn’t much to be said about it.  

David Keogh, one of Henry’s brothers, lived next door to his mum’s flat. During the evening she knocked on the window and rang the bell, which was their signal to each other. She reminded him about his washing which she did for him. She said Henry had been over and had just left.

It was after midnight that a policeman and policewoman came, asking for his mother. He asked them if anything was wrong. They preferred to speak to her. He thought that they probably left without doing so as he didn’t hear her answer the door.

Anna found dead

When Henry arrived home from his mothers’ that evening, he went inside and called out for Anna. No reply. He went through the hallway to the bathroom where the light was on. He found Anna in the bath, sitting at the plug-end, slumped forward on her right side, with her face in the water. He tried to get under her arms from behind and pull her out, but he couldn’t manage it that way. He got her from the front, and managed to drag her over the side of the bath. He laid her on her back on the bedroom floor, near the bathroom doorway.

She had mucous and water around her mouth and nose so he wiped it with some track pants lying nearby, to get a seal for mouth-to-mouth. He tried to do chest compressions. Whatever he did, he couldn’t get her airway cleared. He went to the phone in the hallway and called the ambulance. He went back to Anna and kept trying CPR, but couldn’t get her airway cleared. He only got water coming out. She was blue by this time.

Ambulance officers and police

A person from St John’s Ambulance said they received an emergency call at 9.33 pm; someone had drowned in a bath. He immediately despatched two ambulance crews to the premises. The first crew, Kerry Stevenson and Paul Murgatroyd, arrived at 9.38 pm.

When ambulance or police officers arrive at a scene, they normally send a message to the communication centre to let them know they are leaving the vehicle, so there is normally a fairly precise time of arrival.

There was a dog at the door when they got to the house. They held back for a moment or two, whilst the man put the dog away. They went to the bedroom where they saw a woman on the floor. Stevenson said the man was hunched over the woman crying. She told him to go outside. They connected the equipment. The woman was asystolic (that is, she had no heartbeat) -- clinically dead. They did CPR but got water and vomit from her mouth.

Stevenson said Anna’s hair was ‘damp, but not wet’. The bathroom floor was dry and the bathmat was screwed-up. The man said he’d been doing mouth-to-mouth. The bath was three-quarters full. Stevenson told the man she was sorry, there was nothing further they could do. The man’s hands were over his face. He was crying. She asked if there was anything she could do. The man hugged her and kept his arms around her. Then relatives started coming in. She heard the man say, ‘my back is sore, I hurt it today’ and that he wanted to say goodbye to Anna. 

Five months later, Stevenson made a further statement. She said that she remembered that when they arrived that night, Anna’s body was dry and the carpet was dry. There was no water or vomit on the carpet. When they tried to ventilate Anna, fluid and vomit came up. In her opinion, if a person with first-aid skills had attempted resuscitation, there would have been fluid and vomit in the upper airway. As far as she was aware, ‘this area was clear’. She added that there was water in the bath and it was still warm, ‘but not as warm as I would use for a bath’.

Murgatroyd’s account was much the same as Stevenson’s. They commenced CPR but found the airway full of fluid. They could not get air into the lungs. They stopped resuscitation attempts after ten minutes as they were unable to clear the airway. A short-time later the police arrived and he spoke to them about what had happened.

Some nine months later, Murgatroyd also made another statement. He said that he remembered there was no vomit near the body or on it when he arrived. The hair felt damp; the skin was dry; the towel around her midriff did not seem wet. When the man who was there said he’d been doing CPR, Murgatroyd thought that seemed unusual. He said that on examination, there was ‘water in the mouth’. In his opinion, any attempt at manual compression would have caused vomit and water to spill out; yet there was no sign of any. He had examined the bathroom area but didn’t see any vomit or water on the floor. He said, ‘the bath water was slightly cloudy but there was no sign of vomit in the bath.’

Senior Constable Rex Adams was working in the Communications Room at 9.35 pm that Friday evening. He tasked police officers Williams, Tyson and Horgan to the premises regarding a person collapsed. The ambulance services were on their way. Before the police arrived, the ambulance people had already advised that the woman had died.

Horgan said that at 9.35 pm he was on solo uniform mobile patrol when he attended at the premises to find two ambulances there. Another police vehicle with Williams and Tyson was there. He went inside and saw a woman lying on her back. Her hair appeared to be wet. She was in the doorway of the bedroom ensuite, covered with a white blanket. There was some vomit on the carpet to the left of her head. A man was on her left side, with his head on her chest, crying. The room was neat and tidy. Williams and Tyson began the investigation. Horgan helped by removing the man from the room and keeping relatives away from the bedroom. He said he performed this duty until 11.05 pm, when he returned to base.

Williams said he was on uniform patrol with Tyson when they were tasked to the scene. They met ambulance officers Stevenson and Murgatroyd outside the premises on arrival. They entered the front bedroom and saw a woman lying on the floor. There was a man, very distressed and crying. He was unable to speak because of his emotional state. Williams spoke to Murgatroyd, and then returned to the bedroom to speak to Horgan and Tyson. He then took Murgatroyd to the police car to get a statement from him. Senior Constable Adams arrived.

Williams returned to the house to speak to Tyson and Horgan. Inspector Giles arrived and Williams showed him to the bedroom, along with the officers who had arrived from the Criminal Investigation Branch (CIB). Constable Walkley from the Coroner’s Office arrived. Later that evening, Williams and Walkley organised the removal of the body from the premises. With Senior Constable Jones, Williams lifted the body and carried it to the driveway, where they placed it on a stretcher. 

Adams (from Communications) said he had been requested to attend at the premises. He arrived at 10.00 pm and had a conversation with Williams, who was then in the police car, talking to the ambulance person. He went inside and was met by Horgan inside the front door. He was shown the body, under a blanket, face up on the bedroom floor. He did not enter the room, but looked from the doorway. By this time, the deceased’s mother, father and brother were in the lounge with the fiancé. Adams went to the street and waited until the three members of the Holden Hill CIB arrived.

Constable Tyson was on mobile patrol (with Williams) when she was tasked to the premises. She met ambulance officers Stevenson and Murgatroyd out the front. In the bedroom there was a man kneeling over a body. He was crying openly and was extremely distressed. She took a statement from him. There was no pulse or respiration of the woman on the floor. There was vomit about her face and on the carpet. The bath was three-quarters full and the water was tepid. There were ‘no other signs of suspicious circumstances’. There was a handbag with tablets in it. The head and body were free of marks, bumps or bruises. The body was warm to the touch. Constable Man and Inspector Giles arrived. Constable Walkley (a police officer attached to the Coroner’s Office) had arrived in addition to officers from Technical Services. Tyson then assisted Williams and Walkley to remove the body. The family doctor, Dr Forbes, was contacted.

Inspector Giles said he attended at the premises. In the street outside he met Detective Sergeant Moulds with Constable Man and Detective Senior Constable Fielding from Holden Hill CIB. He went into the bedroom where he spoke to Tyson and Williams. On the floor was the body of a dead woman. Man and Fielding inspected the body. There was pale vomit on the carpet near her mouth. The hair was wet. There was no visible bruising on the body. There was a shaving scar on her right leg and one scar under each breast. Giles spoke to Williams and Tyson regarding the movements of the deceased and the security of the premises. He spoke to Moulds about Technical Services. He went outside and spoke to Adams, then returned to the bedroom and spoke to Walkley.

Tyson showed him a container of tablets. He looked at the bathroom and saw the bath half full of water. Jones of Technical Services took photographs. Giles and Walkley spoke to Tyson and Williams about their Coroner’s Report. Giles telephoned Detective Chief Superintendent Bartlett. As he was concluding the call, Keogh entered the bedroom, followed by Tyson and knelt down next to the deceased. Keogh held and stroked her hand. Walkely said, ‘Who is this?’ Tyson said, ‘this is Henry Keogh her fiancé.’ Keogh said, ‘I was told I could say goodbye, I touched her when I got her out of the bath’. He was sobbing. A short time later the body was carried to a gurney and put in the Coroner’s van. Giles and Walkley spoke again to Tyson and Williams about further inquiries that night, and about contacting the nightshift and the State Duty Officer if enquiries revealed anything unusual.

Constable Man said that on arrival at the scene he and Detective Senior Constable Fielding went to a house two north of the premises where he spoke with Williams who was phoning from there. Williams said that Tyson knew more. Man was then taken to the house by Williams. Man saw some six or seven people in the lounge-room. He went to the main bedroom. Inspector Giles then appeared in the bedroom. Man spoke to Tyson who said that Keogh and the woman had had a drink at the hotel and then returned home.

The woman took the dog for a walk with her sister-in-law, returned home and decided to have a bath. Keogh was to visit his mother. He returned home around 9 pm and found her in the bath. He did CPR and called the ambulance. They arrived but it was no good. Man examined the body in the bedroom. It was a nude female, mid to late 20s, collar-length dark brown straight, wet hair. There was a metal chain around her neck and rings on her fingers, which appeared clean. There was vomit (food and chips) in her teeth and on the right side of her hair and face. On checking the body there were nil suspicious marks, nil injuries recent, nil wrinkly fingers or feet, clean nails, surgical scars beneath both breasts with light scar down the right shin, old; vomit on the carpet near head next to bed; bra, knickers, tracksuit pants by her head. Man searched her scalp, wearing rubber gloves; nil suspicious. Bed queen-size, unmade. Dark quilt, sheet pulled back, nil fluid or blood discharges.

Man noticed Walkley in the room. Giles was still there. Ensuite checked. Shower recess dry, glass streaked, appeared not recently used. Handtowel dry over top of glass facing bath, bath slightly less than three-quarters full, not quite clear water; nothing in the bath. Green aluminium double-pane sliding window, fly screen intact, water in track amongst dust. Window half-open or less.

Man and Moulds went with Keogh to the police car where Man had a conversation with him regarding what had happened. Keogh was sitting in the rear seat and Man was in the left rear seat with Moulds in the right front. Man noted that Keogh was distressed, tears, vague wandering thoughts. Keogh was wearing blue jeans with a yellow striped rugby-type top that appeared damp at the front. Keogh claimed he met his fiancée at the Norwood Hotel around 5.30 pm that evening for a drink. He had three white wines; she had four white wines, possibly one more. Both were home by 7 pm. She took the dog for a walk with her sister-in-law. She returned home and they talked for a short while before Keogh went to see his mother. He appeared to dislike her. He returned after about three-quarters of an hour at 9-9.15 pm. He found Anna in the bath, submerged, after calling through the house for her. He pulled her from the bath and attempted CPR. He called the ambulance. He claimed that he was ex-ambulance. The dog was inside the house when the ambulance arrived. Keogh claimed they were about to marry. They didn’t argue. He said he wanted to get back to her.

Man noted that photographs were taken by Jones of Technical Services. Man left the premises at 11.15 pm. After some discussion with the other officers, it was decided ‘nil suspicious’. It had been a case of drinks, then drowned. ‘Await autopsy at weekend’.

Detective Moulds’ statement confirms most of what Man had said. At the end of the evening he had a conversation with Man, Fielding, Giles and Walkley and formed the opinion that the death was ‘not-suspicious’.

Detective Fielding was also from the Holden Hill CIB. He was on duty with Man and Moulds. He was tasked to the premises. On arrival he spoke to Williams. He went to the bedroom with Man and Moulds. Present there were Tyson and Giles. He saw a body on the floor, covered with a blanket. The body was limp and cool, with the eyes fixed and dilated. The mouth was open and there were no cuts. There was vomit on the side of the face and in the hair which smelled of mousse and make-up. There were ambulance resuscitation pads in the breast area. There were no defence wounds, no wrinkling of the skin and no marks to the feet or hands. There was some clothing at the corner of the bed, track pants, shirt, underpants and bra. No signs of a disturbance or a struggle in the bedroom. The bed was unmade. Fielding went to the bathroom.

There were no signs of entry by the window. No signs of a struggle. There were bottles and containers on the shelves. There was water in the bath that was cool to the touch. It was two-thirds full, with no soap or suds evident. The water looked slightly cloudy. The bath mat was soaking wet on the floor and in a dishevelled position. Walkley of the Coroner’s office was there. Fielding liaised with her and with Jones of Technical Services.

Fielding went to the lounge-room and spoke to Keogh, who was wearing a yellow rugby shirt with jeans and brown slip-on shoes. There was no vomit on his clothing. He was visibly upset and crying. He had gone to see his mother at 8.30 pm. He returned at 9.30 pm and found her in the bath. He broke down, crying. He said he found her on her side with her head under the water, facing the shower. He said he couldn’t pull the plug out as she was on it. He dragged her from the bath to the bedroom to attempt resuscitation. He called the ambulance. He said that Anna was not on any medication or drugs. They had had three or four glasses of wine and some chips at the Norwood Hotel.

Fielding spoke again with Man, Moulds, Walkley and Giles. There were no signs of a struggle. He went to the porch with Man and Moulds and then to the bedroom where Keogh was crying and holding Anna’s hand. Fielding liaised with Walkley and Tyson then left, satisfied that the death was not suspicious.

Walkley said she was a police officer stationed at the Coronial Investigation Centre. She had been there for eleven years. She attended at the scene of sudden-deaths and organized the collection of deceased persons. She had commenced duty at 3.30 pm. At 10.12 pm Police Communications tasked her to attend at the premises. At 10.30 pm she arrived and spoke to Moulds and was shown to the bedroom. There was a woman on the floor, with water and vomit around her mouth and the upper part of her body. Walkley spoke to Man and Fielding. She looked into the bathroom and noticed that there was no soap in the bath-holder and no soap in the bath. The bath mat was scrunched up and it was ‘heavy with water’. The body was pale. She spoke to Fielding and noticed that the hair of the deceased was damp. She removed the deceased to the Coroner’s ambulance and went to the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Dr Wearne examined the body and declared life to be extinct. Walkley took the body to the mortuary at the Forensic Science Centre in Divett Place. 

Senior Constable Jones worked with police Technical Services. He attended with Moulds, Fielding, Man and Walkley. The deceased was on her back, covered with a white sheet. Her feet were in the doorway to the ensuite. Her hair was wet. There was vomit around her mouth and on the carpet. He rolled her onto her left side. There were signs of lividity along the back and lower body. He examined her head and could see no signs of violence. The bath had water in it, about two-thirds full. Jones took photographs of the deceased and also photos of the water level in the bathtub. Interestingly, no one thought to measure how much water there was in the bath.

Other statements

Anna’s father, Dr Kevin Cheney, said that shortly after 9.30 pm Henry had phoned and sounded very distressed. He said, ‘please come around’. He went to the house. The police and ambulance people were there and he went in. An ambulance officer said, ‘she is dead, she appears to have drowned’. Henry was at the table in the dining area. He had his head in his hands, weeping. Kevin said he was surprised when Joanne (Anna’s mother) went and comforted Henry. Henry said, ‘I want her back’, but made no attempt to speak to Kevin, who then went to the bedroom and saw Anna lying on the floor covered with a rug. He looked at her and then went back to the family room. Kevin said that when he saw Anna, the thing that struck him was that she appeared to have vomit in her hair and on the carpet nearby.

Later that night, Joanne said to him, ‘should someone empty the bath?’ Kevin said the water in the bath was clear, but there were flecks of amorphous material on the bottom of it. The bath was only half-full and this struck him as strange. He said that as he emptied the water (after the police had gone) the plug was hard to get out. He also thought that the fact that the floor was not wet in the bathroom seemed strange.

At some time during the evening Kevin rang Marc and Susan to come over. It was an emotional time. He told Marc, on several occasions, that something was wrong. He could not accept that a fit and healthy person could drown in such a small bath. Then Henry’s father and stepmother arrived. Kevin, Joanne and Henry’s parents asked Henry to come home with them, but he wanted to stay there. Kevin thought that to be extraordinary, but he couldn’t really do anything about it, so they left for home soon after.

Anna’s mother, Joanne, said that she had been shopping and got home around 8.50 pm that evening. At about 9.40 pm the phone rang and they were told to go to Anna’s. When they arrived a police officer said, ‘I’m sorry she’s dead’. The ambulance officer said they had tried to resuscitate her but were not successful. Joanne was inside the house for a few minutes before Henry came out of the bedroom. She said to Henry, ‘she wouldn’t commit suicide?’ Henry said there was no question of suicide. She hugged Henry and he said, ‘I want her back. All I wanted was to be a family’. He said, ‘she loved you’ and Joanne said, ‘she loved you too’.

Joanne asked Henry how Anna was in the bath, ‘was she under the water?’ He said, ‘yes, on her side’. She said, ‘she must have died as soon as she got in the bath with her knees up. She must have just rolled over’. Henry never replied.

Lucinda Reu, a friend of Anna’s, said that late that night, Anna’s sister-in-law had phoned to say that Anna had died. The last time Lucinda had seen Anna was at the Law Society about 4.30 pm that day. They had chatted for about ten minutes. Anna asked her to come for a drink, but she said, ‘no thanks’. Anna seemed to be happy. She had known Henry for three years. She had never known Henry to use force. He could be ‘moody’ at times. He could ‘go quiet’. She had no reason to believe they were anything but very much in love with each other. She arrived about 10.30 pm with her husband, Anthony.

Henry told her had a ‘snog’ with Anna earlier in the evening. She understood this to mean they had sex, as this was what he and Anna sometimes called it. They left between 11 pm and midnight. Henry was crying at first and then he seemed all cried out. He seemed keen to stay on his own and said he was going to try to get some sleep. 

Dr Jack Wearne said that at 11.50 pm he was on duty at the accident and emergency department of the Royal Adelaide Hospital. He attended at the rear of the Coroner’s ambulance and declared life to be extinct. 

‘… the death was not suspicious …’

Dr Jack Wearne said that at 11.50pm he was on duty at the accident and emergency department of the Royal Adelaide Hospital. He attended at the rear of the Coroner’s ambulance and declared life to be extinct.

An entry in the Holden Hill Police Station Journal states, in part:

“no suspicious circs, appears drank bottle of wine during evg at hotel, gone home, sat in bath, fallen asleep, drowned. No signs of struggle etc on body at all.”

 

Top of Page