|
Networked Knowledge
|
Channel 7 Today Tonight (Adelaide) 6 December 2004Child Abuse InquiryThis version of the transcript has been edited by Dr Robert N Moles In order of appearanceLeigh McCluskey, Presenter ProgramLeigh McCluskeyTonight a bombshell, just days before the start of South Australia's Child Abuse Inquiry. After months of public and political debate, the State Government finally conceded that a full and proper investigation into allegations of decades of abuse was indeed warranted. And crucial to the impartiality and fairness of that Inquiry is the calibre of the people chosen to conduct it. Tonight we can reveal that the man who's been appointed the Chief Investigator for the Inquiry is a friend and confidante of convicted child sex offender, the former magistrate Peter Liddy. Graham Archer has this exclusive report. Andrew MartinIf that's not the biggest conflict of interest I've heard for a while I don't know what is. Mike HouriganAnd if that investigative process is unsound, then often the conclusions that you come to, can often be questionable. Graham ArcherAs they say - there's been good news and bad news. First - the good news. Jay Weatherill[In Parliament] I seek to move that I have leave to introduce a Bill for an Act to provide for a Commission of Inquiry into allegations of failure on the part of government agencies' employees or other relevant persons to investigate or appropriately deal with allegations concerning sexual offences against children under the guardianship, custody, care or control of the minister responsible for the protection of children, to provide evidentiary powers and immunities in connection with the inquiry and for other purposes. Graham ArcherWednesday marks the official launch of the Judicial Inquiry into abuse of wards of the State. Something the Government scoffed at when we first raised the issue two years ago. Mike Rann[File tape] I wouldn't think however a Royal Commission would be the way to go. Royal Commission's simply cost money. Graham ArcherMost sneering, of course, was the Attorney-General, Michael Atkinson. Here's a sample of his talkback trivialisation of the issue with mate - Father John Fleming. Michael Atkinson[File tape radio discussion] Graham Archer from Channel Seven's Today Tonight was calling for a Royal Commission into child abuse in South Australia covering a period of 30 to 40 years. And barristers were all joking that (tongue in cheek) that this was a tremendous idea because it meant $35m would be spent on them. [laughs] Graham ArcherTalk about preaching to the converted. But despite such mockery, the Rann Government eventually conceded something had to be done; though the commissioning of the Layton Report was an early Government attempt to just shift the deckchairs. Graham Archer[File tape - To Robyn Layton QC at launch of the report] But there are hundreds of cases. Robyn Layton QCWell you say so. Graham ArcherWell I'm sure you know so. You just peel back all of the files in in DCW [Dept of Community Work] and FAYS [Family and Youth Services] and you have a look at what's written in there. Robyn Layton QCI think we'll move to other questions. Graham ArcherNow almost two years down the track a
Judicial Inquiry, a Royal Commission by another name, into systematic abuse of
Wards of the State - what we called The Takeaway Children - will
commence. Crucial to the Inquiry is the public perception of the independence of those involved. Andrew MartinMost definitely - yes. All the cards should be laid on the table and, yeah, and that's all I can say, there should be - the public should be made aware of everything. Graham ArcherKi Meekins was one of those Takeaway Children who had the courage to tell us his story - first bringing this outrage to the surface. Ki Meekins[File tape] Any government's past sins create huge future shadows - now a government cannot build a good future on a devious, heinous past. Graham ArcherBut now, to the not so good news. Andrew MartinThis is not being done the right way, definitely. That's how I feel, you know. Graham ArcherJustice Ted Mullighan, after taking early
retirement from the Supreme Court, will head the Inquiry. And here's the
problem. Not the judge - but the judgement of our Attorney-General about who
will do the investigations. Andrew MartinCould you repeat that - sorry? Graham ArcherWhat I'm saying is the man employed to investigate paedophiles abusing abandoned children has spent the last four years doing the bidding of the State's probably most notorious paedophile - Peter Liddy. Bill Morris is Peter Liddy's power of attorney. He's now heading up the investigation into the abuse of Wards of the State. And the period over which this Inquiry is to look - is exactly the period when this man's friend was most active. Andrew MartinIf that's not a kick in the guts what is? And - oh mate that's just - does not surprise me though, it does not surprise me. Graham ArcherThat's pretty sad isn't it? Andrew MartinVery sad. Graham ArcherThat's right - William Arthur George or Wags Morris, a former copper turned lawyer and not just a friend but power of attorney for Peter Liddy, has been appointed chief investigator to this inquiry into child abuse. Andrew MartinOh that's just - that's knocked me back a peg or two. That's - and I'm relying on these people - or South Australia are relying on these people to do the right thing. Graham ArcherAndrew Martin was one of Liddy's child victims - and with others is suing Liddy for damages. Andrew Martin[File tape] It's ripping me apart - ripping me apart. Mike HouriganWell one of the - one of the critical things about public inquiries is confidence - and it's not just an outcome, it's not conclusions. Graham ArcherMike Hourigan is a former police officer now turned lawyer working in the area of international human rights and he considers transparency crucial for public confidence into inquiries such as this. Mike HouriganIf there was any criticism, whether it be an investigator - or a member of that staff - or the person ultimately leading that inquiry, if there was any question as to their independence it would have - I think, a serious implication on the potential conclusions. And it's like I was saying before - that the forensic process that starts from day one of an inquiry and leading to the ultimate conclusion, if there's any question of of independence or transparency, if there's any question about that, then ultimately the the - the - the final conclusions you draw are questionable. So I'd say that's a serious problem. Graham ArcherBut let's have a quick look at Bill Morris's connections to paedophile - Peter Liddy. After Liddy was charged with 18 counts of child abuse he went to Morris for help. As a friend and power of attorney, Morris received large sums of money for taking care of Liddy's personal business. He and his wife, Barbara, also a lawyer, were amongst the very few allowed into closed court hearings as a part of Liddy's support team. Andrew MartinYou cannot get any closer than that, Graham, without being a Siamese twin. Graham ArcherIn June 2001 when Liddy was sentenced to 25 years jail some of his victims, like Andrew Martin, recommenced their attempts to sue him for a share of his extensive assets. Reading Of ArticleThe shipwreck treasure collection was particularly valuable. Graham ArcherThose who remember the case will know the extraordinary events which surrounded the eventual sale of Liddy's mansion to
conman and former bank robber - Terry Stephens. And we can reveal these were
events in which Bill Morris played an important role. Morris arranged for
Liddy's friend, Eric Van Kruyssen, to visit the house and make their Andrew MartinNo, I wasn't aware of that. So they made their own list and how am I to believe that that list is correct? Graham ArcherThat list became the only list. Andrew MartinOkay, yeah. Graham ArcherThere can be little doubt Morris was familiar with what Liddy owned, after all Morris was more or less his caretaker. But more troubling was what he actually did. While the court had a freeze over Liddy's assets there were a number of attempted break-ins on that property reported to police by Bill Morris. Andrew MartinI'm aware of at least two incidences of reported break-ins to the Kapunda residence. Graham ArcherOr attempted break-ins. Andrew MartinOr attempted break-ins to the Kapunda residence around that time, yes, made to police. Graham ArcherAnd here's the really curious part - it was Bill Morris who would just weeks after reporting these break-ins, cancel Liddy's contents insurance policy which protected those assets. Andrew MartinWhy would you do that? Cancel the insurance policies after Graham ArcherAfter two attempted break-ins had been reported? Andrew MartinAll I - all I have to say to that is why? Graham ArcherAnd even more alarming is that the following month - September 2001 - 1,500 items were removed from the house without trace after a successful break-in. Andrew MartinI just can't comprehend that - and I can't believe that it's been handled this way in our best interests. I just - it's a joke. Graham ArcherEqually alarming is that Liddy - and therefore Morris - was under an order from the court to protect those assets. What's also never been revealed is that the insurance contains a treasure-trove of gold coins and shipwreck items, the whereabouts of which have never been explained. Andrew MartinThat'd be more reason to have the insurance on it if it was vacant. That's more reason to insure your property and keep it insured. Graham ArcherSo on Wednesday we launch an inquiry into the mistreatment of children in state care, the Chief Investigator of which has acted as the power of attorney for one of the State's most notorious paedophiles. Mike HouriganIf there's any questions raised along those lines of independence and impartiality that if they dismiss those out of hand, that in one or two years time whatever conclusions that Inquiry comes to could be questioned. And that would be a, I think a - a sad outcome for a whole lot of effort and a whole lot of expenditure both in money and personal terms. Graham ArcherPerhaps the Attorney-General is right - perhaps it will be a waste of money. But if public confidence is destroyed from the outset the shame will be on his head and not on ours. Andrew MartinWho can I have trust in and faith in? And who - who's working for me here or who's working for us victims here? You know - good old Adelaide.
The materials on this site are the copyright of Networked Knowledge. Copyright Notice The Networked Knowledge web site is hosted and maintained by Howstat Computing Services as a community service. Enquiries to webmaster@howstat.com
|